<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Now Freelance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>My Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on World Currency Blog by cleroux</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/world-currency-blog/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>cleroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/world-currency-blog/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Good point about competition being based on comparitive advantage and efficiency rather than trading because of currency.  I realize I should have thought more about this when writing my blog post in response. 

 Although I understand the exchange differences cause difficulties for some countries, I see the currency difference as a result of a initial trading patterns.  This all reminds me of Dependency Theory in Latin America.  Since those countries are primarily single-export economies and they need to import the majority of their goods from stronger currency countries, they always have current account deficits, rely on more developed nations, and struggle with sustainable development.  As this cycle continues, there is more currency of the less developed country in circulation and so thier currency further devlaues.  

Anyway, I think you are on to something.  I think elimination of currency differences would force a restructuring of this trade pattern, even if those Latin American countries have the comparative advantage in their crops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about competition being based on comparitive advantage and efficiency rather than trading because of currency.  I realize I should have thought more about this when writing my blog post in response. </p>
<p> Although I understand the exchange differences cause difficulties for some countries, I see the currency difference as a result of a initial trading patterns.  This all reminds me of Dependency Theory in Latin America.  Since those countries are primarily single-export economies and they need to import the majority of their goods from stronger currency countries, they always have current account deficits, rely on more developed nations, and struggle with sustainable development.  As this cycle continues, there is more currency of the less developed country in circulation and so thier currency further devlaues.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I think you are on to something.  I think elimination of currency differences would force a restructuring of this trade pattern, even if those Latin American countries have the comparative advantage in their crops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on World Currency Blog by catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/world-currency-blog/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/world-currency-blog/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I got really excited for you when we decided to discuss this in class. Be sure to speak up tomorrow &amp; share your ideas! Go Jazzy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got really excited for you when we decided to discuss this in class. Be sure to speak up tomorrow &amp; share your ideas! Go Jazzy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robert Mundell by catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/robert-mundell/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/robert-mundell/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>but making your little kids learn chinese is good. will get them into college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but making your little kids learn chinese is good. will get them into college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Question by catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/question-2/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/question-2/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we talked about this early on in the class I think. The credit card companies are parts of banks or even just act like banks and hold reserves or have a foreign partner bank that has the money in the foreign currency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we talked about this early on in the class I think. The credit card companies are parts of banks or even just act like banks and hold reserves or have a foreign partner bank that has the money in the foreign currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This evening by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/this-evening/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/this-evening/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>We were all very sad too! We missed you!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were all very sad too! We missed you!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Great minds think alike by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/great-minds-think-alike/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/great-minds-think-alike/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll feel even more brillant after our presentation on currency unions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll feel even more brillant after our presentation on currency unions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Enticing Investors&#8221; article by Blog Comments &#171; Fabulous Insights by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Comments &#171; Fabulous Insights by Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comments</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why not Bretton Woods II?  Why not beyond? by Blog Comments &#171; Fabulous Insights by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/why-not-bretton-woods-ii-why-not-beyond/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Comments &#171; Fabulous Insights by Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/why-not-bretton-woods-ii-why-not-beyond/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/why-not-bretton-woods-ii-why-not-beyond/#comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/why-not-bretton-woods-ii-why-not-beyond/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/why-not-bretton-woods-ii-why-not-beyond/#comments</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attn: Catherine, here is my survey by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/attn-catherine-here-is-my-survey/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/attn-catherine-here-is-my-survey/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>got it. thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got it. thanks. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Enticing Investors&#8221; article by Catherine</title>
		<link>http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jazzleberry.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/enticing-investors-article/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I wonder if these countries could have a better chance of making it/are going to be promising to investors because they can sort of &quot;skip&quot; that whole labor-intensive manufactoring bit and go straight to highly skilled labor products...or maybe become places where companies outsource phone call centers or something (did India ever have a large labor-intensive manufactoring sector before it became a hot bed for the sort of computer help services that it has now...i don&#039;t really know if what i&#039;m talking about makes since...maybe govinda can help us out! ;)

i just know that on the consumption side a lot of countries sort of &quot;skip&quot; technologies...like a country will have basically zero landlines but then they will have a 70% cell phone ownership rate. so what i&#039;m thinking is...is it possible to do this same kind of skipping deal on the production side. 

does this make any sense? what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if these countries could have a better chance of making it/are going to be promising to investors because they can sort of &#8220;skip&#8221; that whole labor-intensive manufactoring bit and go straight to highly skilled labor products&#8230;or maybe become places where companies outsource phone call centers or something (did India ever have a large labor-intensive manufactoring sector before it became a hot bed for the sort of computer help services that it has now&#8230;i don&#8217;t really know if what i&#8217;m talking about makes since&#8230;maybe govinda can help us out! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>i just know that on the consumption side a lot of countries sort of &#8220;skip&#8221; technologies&#8230;like a country will have basically zero landlines but then they will have a 70% cell phone ownership rate. so what i&#8217;m thinking is&#8230;is it possible to do this same kind of skipping deal on the production side. </p>
<p>does this make any sense? what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
